Virginia Campaign Finance Disclosure Law Provides Little Accountability

This is the fifth and final installment of a series on the state of campaign finance law in Virginia. So far in the series, we’ve covered the personal use of campaign funds, which is legal in Virginia, the lack of limits on campaign contributions, and the lack of limits on corporate contributions. We’ve also explored the impact publicly funded elections have on campaign finance. This week, we’re rounding out the series with a consideration of Virginia’s campaign finance disclosure laws, which are often cited as a mechanism for holding candidates accountable. Thanks for staying informed on how Virginia can improve campaign finance law to build a more accountable state government.


Just about anything goes under Virginia campaign finance law. Candidates for state office are allowed to accept unlimited funds from anyone, including corporate interests. Consequently, elections in Virginia have become tremendously expensive; the 2017 gubernatorial election saw 66% of candidate’s money come from contributions larger than $25,000. Furthermore,  Virginia doesn’t prohibit the personal use of campaign funds. That means that — unlike in at least 47 other states and at the federal level— candidates for state office in Virginia face no accountability for using campaign funds for activities unrelated to their campaign. 


Proponents of this status quo say there’s little room for reform. Their argument is centered around the fact that Virginia requires candidates to disclose their contributions and expenditures. Opponents of campaign finance reform say election spending is transparent in Virginia thanks to resources like the Virginia Public Access Project, a non-profit that provides campaign finance disclosures to the public, and that placing limits on contributions would only encourage the flow of dark money. If candidates are required to make public who is funding them and where that money is being spent, the logic goes, Virginians will be able to make informed decisions about who they are electing and the interests they represent. 


A closer look at the way campaign finance disclosure works in Virginia, however, reveals some discouraging truths. 


Virginia law requires candidates disclose the names and some personal information of contributors who spend more than $100 on a campaign per election cycle. Additionally, candidates need to disclose the name and personal information of those they pay with campaign funds. While a “brief description of the purpose of the expenditure” is also required in disclosure forms, there’s no consensus on how specific candidates need to be. The reporting form merely provides a column in which candidates report the “item or service.” 


It’s perfectly legal for candidates to be vague when reporting their expenditures. A now infamous exposé on campaign finance in Virginia reported by the Associated Press in 2016 reported that “some lawmakers reimburse themselves thousands of dollars from their campaigns with only scant explanation, like ‘travel reimbursement.’” 

Furthermore, campaign finance reports submitted by candidates do not undergo any sort of audit conducted by the Board of Elections or any other regulatory agency in the state. The lack of a mechanism to ensure candidates are being truthful about their finances means that Virginia’s disclosure process does very little to hold candidates accountable.


Legislation has been introduced in the past to remedy this glaring problem with campaign finance disclosures. Del. Kaye Kory sponsored a bill in 2020 that would have required the Board of Elections to conduct audits of the campaign finance reports filed by candidates for governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, and the General Assembly. Like many other measures intended to reform campaign finance law in Virginia, the bill never advanced out of committee. 


While the General Assembly largely balked at campaign finance reform efforts during the most recent session, a resolution creating a joint subcommittee to study comprehensive reform was approved. Noting that Virginia has “relied on disclosure by candidates and political committees to keep the process free from corruption,” the committee will consider the effectiveness of disclosure laws, among other things. 

Campaign finance reform has been put on the back burner for too long in Virginia. Studying the issue helps, but nothing will change until legislation is passed. The General Assembly needs to reform campaign finance disclosure law, as well as other laws pertaining to campaign finance, in order to create a state that’s more accountable and responsive to the people.


By VOW Ops April 23, 2026
Manufactured homes are constructed in a factory and then transported to a land plot instead of traditional homes which are built on site. Despite the cost-savings constructors and prospective homeowners earn from manufactured homes, outdated stigma prevents them from being located anywhere other than agricultural zones. As part of her Affordability Agenda, Governor Spanberger has signed legislation which will expand where manufactured homes can be located. Under HB 655 and SB 346, starting July 1st Manufactured homes can now be located within any residential zone intended for traditional homes (with exceptions for historic districts). Further, localities will not be permitted to place different rules or any additional restrictions on manufactured homes that would not be imposed on single-family homes. Both bills passed the General Assembly with near-unanimous support. Executive Director of the Virginia Manufactured and Modular Housing Association Randy Grumbine says the new laws “could be very significant” in removing barriers that have been in place for decades. In 2020, a single-section manufactured home cost 35% the price of a similar-sized traditional home. Virginians have been facing affordability challenges when looking for housing – especially over the last several years – and they continue to experience a housing shortage which only exacerbates the problem. Del. Maldonado and Sen. VanValkenburg have noted that the strong bipartisan support they received for their respective bills is because Virginia’s housing crisis affects everyone regardless of partisan affiliation. Beyond the expansion of locations for manufactured homes, Governor Spanberger also signed HB 1227, which increases the amount of state funding toward affordable housing. She also signed HB 4, which gives localities the authority to require property owners to give the local government or developer the first chance to purchase property to build affordable housing. You can read the full article here for more details.
By VOW Ops April 23, 2026
[Virginia Mercury] Virginia Lawmakers Recess Special Session Without Budget Deal
By VOW Ops March 19, 2026
Virginia’s growing data center economy was the center of attention for this year’s General Assembly session, with lawmakers balancing the industry’s benefits against its costs to communities. Of the many bills that were proposed to regulate data centers, some passed both the House and Senate and now head to Governor Spanberger’s desk for either her signature or veto. SB 253 (Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth) would extend a program Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power Company offer low-income customers to reduce their monthly energy bills by weatherproofing their houses. The bill also gives the State Corporation Commission (SCC) the liberty to determine if more of the cost of generating electricity for data centers should fall onto them and large manufacturers instead of homeowners. SB 553 (Sen. Srinivasan, D-Loudoun) would direct water utilities to provide monthly or quarterly reports on how much water they are providing to data centers. Currently, data centers can withhold their water usage as an industry secret. SB 94 (Sen. Roem, D-Manassas) and HB 153 (Del. Thomas, D-Prince William) would require applicants who request localities to rezone for “high-load users” to submit site assessment reports. Localities would then be able to use the information from said reports to determine if the application conforms with their zoning requirements. HB 507 (Del. McAuliff, D-Loudoun) would mandate the Department of Environmental Quality to deny air permits for data center generators after July 2026 unless they meet stricter environmental regulations. Currently, data centers are allowed limited use of backup generators that run on diesel fuel, which have resulted in next-door neighbors complaining of noxious fumes spilling into their communities. HB 323 (Del. Sullivan, D-Fairfax) directs the Department of Energy to study how to best utilize waste heat generated by data centers to meet heating demands from neighboring buildings. One of the most robust debates involving data centers revolved around the sales tax exemption given to them on their server equipment and software. The Senate budget bill would end the exemption, hoping to recover the $1.6 billion they argue the state loses annually as a result. The House budget bill would keep the exemption but stipulate additional requirements for data centers to remain in compliance with receiving the exemption. The data center industry has rebutted the proposals to end the tax exemption, arguing that it has brought billions of dollars in investment into Virginia. Furthermore, the issue does not fall along clear, partisan lines, with both Democrats and Republicans arguing for against ending the exemption. The issue has ultimately ground Virginia’s budget approval process to a halt, with neither chamber coming to a consensus on the state’s biennial budget. Governor Spanberger has called for a special session beginning April 23rd so that the General Assembly can resolve the dispute. You can read the full article here for more details.
Show More