Virginia Campaign Finance Disclosure Law Provides Little Accountability

This is the fifth and final installment of a series on the state of campaign finance law in Virginia. So far in the series, we’ve covered the personal use of campaign funds, which is legal in Virginia, the lack of limits on campaign contributions, and the lack of limits on corporate contributions. We’ve also explored the impact publicly funded elections have on campaign finance. This week, we’re rounding out the series with a consideration of Virginia’s campaign finance disclosure laws, which are often cited as a mechanism for holding candidates accountable. Thanks for staying informed on how Virginia can improve campaign finance law to build a more accountable state government.


Just about anything goes under Virginia campaign finance law. Candidates for state office are allowed to accept unlimited funds from anyone, including corporate interests. Consequently, elections in Virginia have become tremendously expensive; the 2017 gubernatorial election saw 66% of candidate’s money come from contributions larger than $25,000. Furthermore,  Virginia doesn’t prohibit the personal use of campaign funds. That means that — unlike in at least 47 other states and at the federal level— candidates for state office in Virginia face no accountability for using campaign funds for activities unrelated to their campaign. 


Proponents of this status quo say there’s little room for reform. Their argument is centered around the fact that Virginia requires candidates to disclose their contributions and expenditures. Opponents of campaign finance reform say election spending is transparent in Virginia thanks to resources like the Virginia Public Access Project, a non-profit that provides campaign finance disclosures to the public, and that placing limits on contributions would only encourage the flow of dark money. If candidates are required to make public who is funding them and where that money is being spent, the logic goes, Virginians will be able to make informed decisions about who they are electing and the interests they represent. 


A closer look at the way campaign finance disclosure works in Virginia, however, reveals some discouraging truths. 


Virginia law requires candidates disclose the names and some personal information of contributors who spend more than $100 on a campaign per election cycle. Additionally, candidates need to disclose the name and personal information of those they pay with campaign funds. While a “brief description of the purpose of the expenditure” is also required in disclosure forms, there’s no consensus on how specific candidates need to be. The reporting form merely provides a column in which candidates report the “item or service.” 


It’s perfectly legal for candidates to be vague when reporting their expenditures. A now infamous exposé on campaign finance in Virginia reported by the Associated Press in 2016 reported that “some lawmakers reimburse themselves thousands of dollars from their campaigns with only scant explanation, like ‘travel reimbursement.’” 

Furthermore, campaign finance reports submitted by candidates do not undergo any sort of audit conducted by the Board of Elections or any other regulatory agency in the state. The lack of a mechanism to ensure candidates are being truthful about their finances means that Virginia’s disclosure process does very little to hold candidates accountable.


Legislation has been introduced in the past to remedy this glaring problem with campaign finance disclosures. Del. Kaye Kory sponsored a bill in 2020 that would have required the Board of Elections to conduct audits of the campaign finance reports filed by candidates for governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, and the General Assembly. Like many other measures intended to reform campaign finance law in Virginia, the bill never advanced out of committee. 


While the General Assembly largely balked at campaign finance reform efforts during the most recent session, a resolution creating a joint subcommittee to study comprehensive reform was approved. Noting that Virginia has “relied on disclosure by candidates and political committees to keep the process free from corruption,” the committee will consider the effectiveness of disclosure laws, among other things. 

Campaign finance reform has been put on the back burner for too long in Virginia. Studying the issue helps, but nothing will change until legislation is passed. The General Assembly needs to reform campaign finance disclosure law, as well as other laws pertaining to campaign finance, in order to create a state that’s more accountable and responsive to the people.


By VOW Ops January 21, 2026
The second year of results from Virginia’s recently established Quality Establishment and Improvement System (VQB5) for early childhood education found that 99% of childcare providers receiving state funding meet or exceed quality expectations. As of early December 2025, over 154,000 views have been recorded on the system’s website since its October 2024 debut, revealing the many parents and families who appreciate the information that VQB5 offers them. None of these wonderful results would even be available to admire without the support and success we had in passing HB 1012 and SB 578 back in 2020! The data focuses on classroom interactions between children and caregivers and notes how said interactions encourage kids to express themselves at a young age. The state has also enacted categories of excellence for providers who score in the top 10%, exceed quality expectations, or even show significant improvement from an evaluation the year before. On top of that, a new data system called VAConnects helps integrate information on students over the years to track their learning progress. The Department of Education wishes to sustain the program and has requested $735,000 to do so. Overall, Virginia is serving as a model for other states to use in establishing best practices for their early childhood programs. Read more here .
By VOW Ops January 21, 2026
An August survey reveals that large majorities of Virginians want state lawmakers to address the rising cost of housing. The survey was conducted by Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia and Freedom Virginia. More than 8 in 10 Virginians said the General Assembly needs to act. More than 3 in 4 Virginians want lawmakers to prevent landlords from raising rents each year by more than 7%. Many Virginians also supported the idea of the state incentivizing localities to build more housing and providing developers with an ability to appeal rejected housing projects. Many proposals that were made to address all these public concerns were struck down during the 2025 legislative session. One of the main reasons why all the mentioned proposals failed to pass the General Assembly is because of the large influence the local government lobbies have in Richmond in protecting what little authority they are granted by the state. However, 6 in 10 Virginians indicated that they are more concerned with providing more housing than protecting local government authority. Read more here.
By VOW Ops December 19, 2025
Governor-elect Spanberger has released details on how her administration will work with the General Assembly to address affordability issues for Virginians regarding health care, energy, and housing. Democrats in the General Assembly argue the proposals are needed to mitigate the effects of President Trump’s tariff policies and reduction of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies. Some of the solutions being proposed are legislation from the previous session that were vetoed by Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin. In health care, Spanberger and Virginia Democrats will tackle pharmacy benefit managers’ ability to compel patients toward using affiliated-only pharmacies. The incoming administration also wants to limit the number of times insurance companies can request approvals from patients receiving certain cancer cares and medicines for chronic conditions. Democrats are also reviving legislation that would prohibit insurance companies from charging tobacco smokers higher premiums. Further, Spanberger supports implementing a pilot program to help Virginians who will face unaffordable insurance premiums resulting from the expiration of the ACA enhanced tax credits. In energy, Spanberger called to make it easier for Virginians to utilize small-scale solar panels which don’t require hard labor to install. She also wants the previously vetoed legislation that would set energy storage standards for utility companies brought back to her desk (Governor Youngkin vetoed it because of his belief that the Virginia Clean Economy Act associated with it was ineffective). In housing, Spanberger and Democrats are reviving legislation from 2025 that would extend the grace period tenants have before being evicted for missing rent payments. They are also proposing changes that would give local governments priority in acquiring affordable multi-family units supported by tax credits when the owner wants to sell or convert them. Further, Democrats are reintroducing a bill which would allow all localities to change their zoning ordinances to create dense and affordable housing (currently, only the counties of Albemarle and Loudoun and the cities of Alexandria, Charlottesville, and Fairfax are granted such provisions). Read more here.
Show More