The History and Future of Energy Utilities

The 2020 General Assembly Session saw a record number of energy bills, many aimed at changing the way our electric utilities operate. One, in particular, would have completely changed the energy monopoly paradigm in Virginia. This raises an age-old question here in the Commonwealth: do we need our electric utilities to have a monopoly over their respective regions?


History


Many investor-owned utilities, like Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power here in Virginia, are “vertically integrated.” This means they produce the electricity, transmit it, and distribute it to the end-user all themselves. The vertically integrated structure largely comes from the historic rise of power plants and the needs of the time.

First, when electricity was just beginning to have practical applicability, and some were considering the ability to provide it to buildings and residences, a number of factors resulted in the prevalence of alternating current (AC), instead of direct current (DC). AC is capable of carrying power much greater distances. Second, steam turbines were more readily used because of their production capacity. Steam turbines are very large, and combined with the ability to carry electricity further, power plants got much bigger and were built further away from the population centers they were powering.


In order to deal with these larger, more distant power plants, a vast infrastructure of transmission and distribution lines needed to be built. The combination of these factors created two structural conditions for the electricity market: a high barrier to entry and enormous economies of scale. These two components tend to create a natural monopoly. However, regulators were wary of splitting up these monopolies because of the desire for reliable and readily available energy, which could only be met by one of these energy behemoths. The compromise was a regulated monopoly. In the energy space, a regulated monopoly can’t profit, but it can charge what is deemed “reasonable” for its costs and returns for investors. This structure provided cheap and expansive energy for the whole country.


Electricity Monopolies Today


Many argue that, while this structure was historically necessary, the model no longer works. The rate structure of a regulated monopoly removes any outside competition. Rates are set by regulators, not by the market. Utilities have little incentive for innovation because of the guaranteed returns, the expansive bureaucracy created by regulatory agencies, and the significant sunk costs.


Further, technology is reducing costs in a few different ways. New technology surrounding energy generation, like solar and wind, can significantly lower fuel costs. On the demand side, new technologies like smart meters and energy-efficient appliances can ease costs by reducing demand. The advent of net-metering also allows for the possibility of a multidirectional grid. Investment into innovations like these is crucial to advancing the electric grid to provide power more efficiently, reliably, and inexpensively. It remains to be seen if utilities will continue to drag their feet on modernizing, or if the threat of change will be enough to move the needle.


HB 1677



Delegate Keam introduced a bill to begin shifting this model.  HB 1677 would have replaced the Virginia Utility Regulation Act and allowed consumers to purchase electricity from the retail provider of their choice. The bill would have accomplished this by abandoning the vertical integration structure and requiring all incumbent investor-owned utilities, municipal power producers, and electric cooperatives to separate their distribution, transmission, and power generation functions. According to the proposed legislation, this can be achieved by creating separate companies or selling assets to a third party. This would allow customers to select their retail provider and allow the remaining (and new) companies to sort out the energy supply chain in a competitive environment. The bill was continued to 2021, which means there is hope that it will be discussed with some sincerity next year.


By VOW Ops April 23, 2026
Manufactured homes are constructed in a factory and then transported to a land plot instead of traditional homes which are built on site. Despite the cost-savings constructors and prospective homeowners earn from manufactured homes, outdated stigma prevents them from being located anywhere other than agricultural zones. As part of her Affordability Agenda, Governor Spanberger has signed legislation which will expand where manufactured homes can be located. Under HB 655 and SB 346, starting July 1st Manufactured homes can now be located within any residential zone intended for traditional homes (with exceptions for historic districts). Further, localities will not be permitted to place different rules or any additional restrictions on manufactured homes that would not be imposed on single-family homes. Both bills passed the General Assembly with near-unanimous support. Executive Director of the Virginia Manufactured and Modular Housing Association Randy Grumbine says the new laws “could be very significant” in removing barriers that have been in place for decades. In 2020, a single-section manufactured home cost 35% the price of a similar-sized traditional home. Virginians have been facing affordability challenges when looking for housing – especially over the last several years – and they continue to experience a housing shortage which only exacerbates the problem. Del. Maldonado and Sen. VanValkenburg have noted that the strong bipartisan support they received for their respective bills is because Virginia’s housing crisis affects everyone regardless of partisan affiliation. Beyond the expansion of locations for manufactured homes, Governor Spanberger also signed HB 1227, which increases the amount of state funding toward affordable housing. She also signed HB 4, which gives localities the authority to require property owners to give the local government or developer the first chance to purchase property to build affordable housing. You can read the full article here for more details.
By VOW Ops April 23, 2026
[Virginia Mercury] Virginia Lawmakers Recess Special Session Without Budget Deal
By VOW Ops March 19, 2026
Virginia’s growing data center economy was the center of attention for this year’s General Assembly session, with lawmakers balancing the industry’s benefits against its costs to communities. Of the many bills that were proposed to regulate data centers, some passed both the House and Senate and now head to Governor Spanberger’s desk for either her signature or veto. SB 253 (Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth) would extend a program Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power Company offer low-income customers to reduce their monthly energy bills by weatherproofing their houses. The bill also gives the State Corporation Commission (SCC) the liberty to determine if more of the cost of generating electricity for data centers should fall onto them and large manufacturers instead of homeowners. SB 553 (Sen. Srinivasan, D-Loudoun) would direct water utilities to provide monthly or quarterly reports on how much water they are providing to data centers. Currently, data centers can withhold their water usage as an industry secret. SB 94 (Sen. Roem, D-Manassas) and HB 153 (Del. Thomas, D-Prince William) would require applicants who request localities to rezone for “high-load users” to submit site assessment reports. Localities would then be able to use the information from said reports to determine if the application conforms with their zoning requirements. HB 507 (Del. McAuliff, D-Loudoun) would mandate the Department of Environmental Quality to deny air permits for data center generators after July 2026 unless they meet stricter environmental regulations. Currently, data centers are allowed limited use of backup generators that run on diesel fuel, which have resulted in next-door neighbors complaining of noxious fumes spilling into their communities. HB 323 (Del. Sullivan, D-Fairfax) directs the Department of Energy to study how to best utilize waste heat generated by data centers to meet heating demands from neighboring buildings. One of the most robust debates involving data centers revolved around the sales tax exemption given to them on their server equipment and software. The Senate budget bill would end the exemption, hoping to recover the $1.6 billion they argue the state loses annually as a result. The House budget bill would keep the exemption but stipulate additional requirements for data centers to remain in compliance with receiving the exemption. The data center industry has rebutted the proposals to end the tax exemption, arguing that it has brought billions of dollars in investment into Virginia. Furthermore, the issue does not fall along clear, partisan lines, with both Democrats and Republicans arguing for against ending the exemption. The issue has ultimately ground Virginia’s budget approval process to a halt, with neither chamber coming to a consensus on the state’s biennial budget. Governor Spanberger has called for a special session beginning April 23rd so that the General Assembly can resolve the dispute. You can read the full article here for more details.
Show More