How a pandemic exposed the need for expanded voting

VaOurWay has long been a proponent of expanding voter access, from no-excuse absentee voting to early voting opportunities. This stems from the belief that every citizen should have an opportunity to be heard. In-person voting at a specific place during a specific time can be very burdensome for people with various disabilities, a lack of transportation, or a lack of flexibility on a workday. This has only worsened in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Now more than ever we need flexible voting options. Voters should not be faced with a decision between their own health and casting their ballot. 



How is COVID-19 impacting voting?


Polling places during election season are generally small and naturally crowded places. These are exactly the types of public gatherings that should be discouraged while our nation is trying to get the virus under control. As a result, many local elections have already been postponed. 15 states have already delayed primaries or allowed for voting by mail with extended deadlines. 


Wisconsin held its primary elections on April 7, following the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision to require the primaries to move ahead as planned. Many criticized the decision as a partisan move. As a result, the state saw starkly low voter turnout, a shortage of poll workers, shuttered polling places, and exceedingly long lines in compliance with social distancing guidelines. Wisconsin’s primaries showed the nation why we need a better option.  


What is ‘Vote at Home’?


With the Vote at Home system, registered voters receive their ballots automatically through the mail two weeks before election day. Once they are filled out, voters return their ballots either in-person or by mail. They must be postmarked by election day. 


Opponents of this system, including President Trump, have decried it as unsafe, costly, and partisan. However, paper ballots are much more difficult to tamper with because there will always be a paper trail. In Colorado, voters sign a barcode on the envelope which much match the signature given at the time of registration. Additionally, most jurisdictions that have implemented mail-in voting have seen a reduction in overall costs.


Finally, while expanded voter access has largely been viewed as a Democratic issue, Republicans should be equally as eager to implement these measures because many of their voters are older and particularly susceptible to coronavirus.  


States that have already implemented these measures are seeing record voter turnout. In 2016 there was an average increase of 20% in voter turnout, and an average increase of 30% in 2018. It’s clear that people prefer the convenience of flexible voting. 


The National Disaster and Emergency Ballot Act


November seems far away, but in order for states that are not currently equipped for mail-in ballots to prepare themselves, they must start now. Accordingly, Senators Klobuchar and Wyden have sponsored a bill called the National Disaster and Emergency Ballot Act. This would ensure every voter a secure mail-in paper ballot. It also expands early voting options to avoid lines, helps states recruit younger poll workers, and puts restrictions around federal investment into internet voting, which most experts say is insecure. 

With the presidency, 11 gubernatorial races, 35 Senate seats, and all 435 House of Representative seats on the line this November, we must take steps to ensure that all voters can safely cast their ballots without risking their health. 


By VOW Ops April 23, 2026
Manufactured homes are constructed in a factory and then transported to a land plot instead of traditional homes which are built on site. Despite the cost-savings constructors and prospective homeowners earn from manufactured homes, outdated stigma prevents them from being located anywhere other than agricultural zones. As part of her Affordability Agenda, Governor Spanberger has signed legislation which will expand where manufactured homes can be located. Under HB 655 and SB 346, starting July 1st Manufactured homes can now be located within any residential zone intended for traditional homes (with exceptions for historic districts). Further, localities will not be permitted to place different rules or any additional restrictions on manufactured homes that would not be imposed on single-family homes. Both bills passed the General Assembly with near-unanimous support. Executive Director of the Virginia Manufactured and Modular Housing Association Randy Grumbine says the new laws “could be very significant” in removing barriers that have been in place for decades. In 2020, a single-section manufactured home cost 35% the price of a similar-sized traditional home. Virginians have been facing affordability challenges when looking for housing – especially over the last several years – and they continue to experience a housing shortage which only exacerbates the problem. Del. Maldonado and Sen. VanValkenburg have noted that the strong bipartisan support they received for their respective bills is because Virginia’s housing crisis affects everyone regardless of partisan affiliation. Beyond the expansion of locations for manufactured homes, Governor Spanberger also signed HB 1227, which increases the amount of state funding toward affordable housing. She also signed HB 4, which gives localities the authority to require property owners to give the local government or developer the first chance to purchase property to build affordable housing. You can read the full article here for more details.
By VOW Ops April 23, 2026
[Virginia Mercury] Virginia Lawmakers Recess Special Session Without Budget Deal
By VOW Ops March 19, 2026
Virginia’s growing data center economy was the center of attention for this year’s General Assembly session, with lawmakers balancing the industry’s benefits against its costs to communities. Of the many bills that were proposed to regulate data centers, some passed both the House and Senate and now head to Governor Spanberger’s desk for either her signature or veto. SB 253 (Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth) would extend a program Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power Company offer low-income customers to reduce their monthly energy bills by weatherproofing their houses. The bill also gives the State Corporation Commission (SCC) the liberty to determine if more of the cost of generating electricity for data centers should fall onto them and large manufacturers instead of homeowners. SB 553 (Sen. Srinivasan, D-Loudoun) would direct water utilities to provide monthly or quarterly reports on how much water they are providing to data centers. Currently, data centers can withhold their water usage as an industry secret. SB 94 (Sen. Roem, D-Manassas) and HB 153 (Del. Thomas, D-Prince William) would require applicants who request localities to rezone for “high-load users” to submit site assessment reports. Localities would then be able to use the information from said reports to determine if the application conforms with their zoning requirements. HB 507 (Del. McAuliff, D-Loudoun) would mandate the Department of Environmental Quality to deny air permits for data center generators after July 2026 unless they meet stricter environmental regulations. Currently, data centers are allowed limited use of backup generators that run on diesel fuel, which have resulted in next-door neighbors complaining of noxious fumes spilling into their communities. HB 323 (Del. Sullivan, D-Fairfax) directs the Department of Energy to study how to best utilize waste heat generated by data centers to meet heating demands from neighboring buildings. One of the most robust debates involving data centers revolved around the sales tax exemption given to them on their server equipment and software. The Senate budget bill would end the exemption, hoping to recover the $1.6 billion they argue the state loses annually as a result. The House budget bill would keep the exemption but stipulate additional requirements for data centers to remain in compliance with receiving the exemption. The data center industry has rebutted the proposals to end the tax exemption, arguing that it has brought billions of dollars in investment into Virginia. Furthermore, the issue does not fall along clear, partisan lines, with both Democrats and Republicans arguing for against ending the exemption. The issue has ultimately ground Virginia’s budget approval process to a halt, with neither chamber coming to a consensus on the state’s biennial budget. Governor Spanberger has called for a special session beginning April 23rd so that the General Assembly can resolve the dispute. You can read the full article here for more details.
Show More