Is 60 Days Enough Time?

On January 12, 2022, Virginia’s General Assembly will begin a 60-day legislative session. In just two short months, the legislature will fulfill its duty of representing constituents by considering hundreds of bills, approving a two-year budget, and electing judges to the state’s courts. 


That’s a lot of work in a little time. But believe it or not, the 60-day 2022 regular session is actually a long session. The Virginia state constitution mandates that the General Assembly convene for an annual regular session on the second Wednesday of each January. In even-numbered years, the legislature meets for 60 calendar days. And in odd-numbered years, the legislature meets for just 30 calendar days, although these sessions are traditionally extended to 45 days. 


The General Assembly can also convene for special sessions, which are prompted by calls from the Governor or by petition from two-thirds of members from both the House and Senate. Special sessions have been keeping the General Assembly in Richmond for longer amounts of time in recent years -- in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020, the General Assembly held a 60-day special session from August to October. 


Why does Virginia’s General Assembly meet for such short periods of time? Like many other states, Virginia designed its legislative calendar to promote the ideal of “citizen legislators.” These representatives would come to Richmond for a month or two each year to legislate, and then return to their districts to work more typical jobs. In a state with strong agricultural history like Virginia, meeting for the legislative session during winter months was convenient for farmers — while there wasn’t any harvesting to be done, farmers could either serve in the legislature, or come to observe the public proceedings in Richmond themselves.


Today, though, Virginia has a diverse economy and
a population of 8.6 million. This has ignited debate about whether Virginia should transition from a part-time legislature to a full-time legislature in order to better address the complex needs of constituents.


Those who wish to preserve Virginia’s part-time legislative model say that when legislators are able to return home to their districts for months at a time, representation is strengthened. Legislators have plenty of time to speak with their neighbors and learn about what’s happening in the community. Additionally, legislators have the ability to live and work under the laws that they create. The logic is that when legislators are embedded in their districts for most of the year, they will have a better idea of how to represent their constituents when they come to Richmond in the winter.


Proponents of a full-time legislature in Virginia, however, say that more than 60 days are needed in order to effectively govern a modern state. They point to the fact that both the House of Delegates and the state Senate are forced to limit the number of bills members are permitted to introduce; this could create a situation in which necessary legislation doesn’t even have the opportunity to be considered. And because so many bills are considered in such a short period of time, it’s difficult for constituents to follow what’s occurring at the General Assembly. 


Furthermore, although Virginia legislators only work a few months out of the year, lobbyists never stop working. This causes what’s known as “copycat” bills to be introduced in Virginia —
bills written by special interests with boilerplate language that are introduced in several states. If Virginia had a full-time General Assembly, legislators would have the time and resources to write bills that accurately reflect the needs and desires of Virginians.


Virginia isn’t unique in having a part-time legislature.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, just four states have a full-time legislature — California, Michigan, New York, and Pennsylvania. These states, which all have large populations, pay their legislators a full-time wage and provide large, well-paid staff. 


The debate around the length of Virginia’s General Assembly sessions isn’t likely to end any time soon. In the meantime, legislators are gearing up for a legislative session in which Republicans will control the House of Delegates and Democrats will control the Senate. This week, members will have the ability to
begin prefiling legislation. This legislative session is expected to last from January 12 through March 12.

By VOW Ops April 23, 2026
Manufactured homes are constructed in a factory and then transported to a land plot instead of traditional homes which are built on site. Despite the cost-savings constructors and prospective homeowners earn from manufactured homes, outdated stigma prevents them from being located anywhere other than agricultural zones. As part of her Affordability Agenda, Governor Spanberger has signed legislation which will expand where manufactured homes can be located. Under HB 655 and SB 346, starting July 1st Manufactured homes can now be located within any residential zone intended for traditional homes (with exceptions for historic districts). Further, localities will not be permitted to place different rules or any additional restrictions on manufactured homes that would not be imposed on single-family homes. Both bills passed the General Assembly with near-unanimous support. Executive Director of the Virginia Manufactured and Modular Housing Association Randy Grumbine says the new laws “could be very significant” in removing barriers that have been in place for decades. In 2020, a single-section manufactured home cost 35% the price of a similar-sized traditional home. Virginians have been facing affordability challenges when looking for housing – especially over the last several years – and they continue to experience a housing shortage which only exacerbates the problem. Del. Maldonado and Sen. VanValkenburg have noted that the strong bipartisan support they received for their respective bills is because Virginia’s housing crisis affects everyone regardless of partisan affiliation. Beyond the expansion of locations for manufactured homes, Governor Spanberger also signed HB 1227, which increases the amount of state funding toward affordable housing. She also signed HB 4, which gives localities the authority to require property owners to give the local government or developer the first chance to purchase property to build affordable housing. You can read the full article here for more details.
By VOW Ops April 23, 2026
[Virginia Mercury] Virginia Lawmakers Recess Special Session Without Budget Deal
By VOW Ops March 19, 2026
Virginia’s growing data center economy was the center of attention for this year’s General Assembly session, with lawmakers balancing the industry’s benefits against its costs to communities. Of the many bills that were proposed to regulate data centers, some passed both the House and Senate and now head to Governor Spanberger’s desk for either her signature or veto. SB 253 (Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth) would extend a program Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power Company offer low-income customers to reduce their monthly energy bills by weatherproofing their houses. The bill also gives the State Corporation Commission (SCC) the liberty to determine if more of the cost of generating electricity for data centers should fall onto them and large manufacturers instead of homeowners. SB 553 (Sen. Srinivasan, D-Loudoun) would direct water utilities to provide monthly or quarterly reports on how much water they are providing to data centers. Currently, data centers can withhold their water usage as an industry secret. SB 94 (Sen. Roem, D-Manassas) and HB 153 (Del. Thomas, D-Prince William) would require applicants who request localities to rezone for “high-load users” to submit site assessment reports. Localities would then be able to use the information from said reports to determine if the application conforms with their zoning requirements. HB 507 (Del. McAuliff, D-Loudoun) would mandate the Department of Environmental Quality to deny air permits for data center generators after July 2026 unless they meet stricter environmental regulations. Currently, data centers are allowed limited use of backup generators that run on diesel fuel, which have resulted in next-door neighbors complaining of noxious fumes spilling into their communities. HB 323 (Del. Sullivan, D-Fairfax) directs the Department of Energy to study how to best utilize waste heat generated by data centers to meet heating demands from neighboring buildings. One of the most robust debates involving data centers revolved around the sales tax exemption given to them on their server equipment and software. The Senate budget bill would end the exemption, hoping to recover the $1.6 billion they argue the state loses annually as a result. The House budget bill would keep the exemption but stipulate additional requirements for data centers to remain in compliance with receiving the exemption. The data center industry has rebutted the proposals to end the tax exemption, arguing that it has brought billions of dollars in investment into Virginia. Furthermore, the issue does not fall along clear, partisan lines, with both Democrats and Republicans arguing for against ending the exemption. The issue has ultimately ground Virginia’s budget approval process to a halt, with neither chamber coming to a consensus on the state’s biennial budget. Governor Spanberger has called for a special session beginning April 23rd so that the General Assembly can resolve the dispute. You can read the full article here for more details.
Show More