Election Security: Does it matter?

As Americans, we are proud to claim free and fair elections as a basic tenet of our democracy. The guarantee of “one citizen, one vote” is the hallmark of secure democratic elections. Globally, more than half of all people are denied free and fair elections, among other civil liberties.


Why is election security important?


Election security affects all of us. We go to the polls with the confidence that our vote will count. Even if our candidate doesn’t win, it is our civic duty to represent our interests at the ballot box on election day.

Historically, there are often detractors who will contest the final election results. Yet, in the U.S. there is a long-standing tradition of the losing candidate conceding victory to the winner. The peaceful transition of power is a key part of our democratic ideals.


However, if a majority of people question the validity of an election result, the confidence in our democracy is undermined. Outside interference could open the door to chaos. That’s why the work to ensure election security is so important. 


Who is working to ensure our election security?


The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) works to protect elections across the U.S. Specifically, the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is the lead federal agency that collaborates with state governments to ensure election security. The evolving nature of threats to elections requires constant vigilance, innovation, and adaptation.  


While this national agency helps to manage risks, the ultimate responsibility of administering any election is on state and local governments. 


That’s why the Virginia Department of Elections works closely with DHS and the Virginia Information Technology Agency to provide cyber services that modern-day elections require. With the advent of new technologies, the states face several stumbling blocks to election security. 


What are the problems facing election security?


The digital revolution of the 21st century has yielded new technologies that have been incorporated into the electoral process. These have been known to increase the efficiency of elections, but they also come with their own slew of vulnerabilities. 


Elections have become easier to manipulate because digital systems are vulnerable to cyber-attacks from hackers. 


In July, the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee released a bipartisan report with evidence that Russia targeted U.S. election infrastructure in the 2016 Presidential election. 50 states were targeted in this unprecedented attack on election security. 


While the Commonwealth of Virginia administers our elections, it cannot fight the powerful forces of foreign “cyber armies” alone. The federal government did not warn state governments of the extreme threat of foreign election interference. This failure on the part of DHS could continue to put our democracy at risk in future elections. 


What are some solutions to election insecurity?


States have a big role to play in securing elections. A basic step is better communication with the federal government to defend against cyber-attacks. Other election infrastructure issues include aging voting equipment, paperless machines without back-ups, and insecure voting registration databases.


The “Help Americans Vote Act” (HAVA), established in 2002 and renewed 2018, is a federal grant designed to secure and improve the election system. Virginia is included in the highest funding bracket, receiving over nine million dollars. To receive this grant, the state submitted a funding proposal with an itemized budget of activities. 


With the funds, Virginia has big plans for election security: increased cybersecurity training, increased security for elections data, and establishing more robust certification standards for voting equipment.



While there has been no mandate to do, in 2017 many districts in Virginia returned to paper ballots as a means of ensuring election security. So the ballots are hand marked with a voter’s choice and then counted by an electric scanner. Most importantly, the original paper ballots are retained so that they can be verified if a recount becomes necessary. Advocates believe this to be the most secure method. Localities are very often ill-equipped to handle the cyber-security needed to maintain electronic voting machines, leaving paper ballots as a viable alternative. 


Our ability to hold secure elections are what make us a free and fair democracy. As voters, we can empower ourselves by staying informed in order to hold our government accountable. It is vital that Virginia continue its efforts to make our votes secure, especially in this election year.


By VOW Ops April 23, 2026
Manufactured homes are constructed in a factory and then transported to a land plot instead of traditional homes which are built on site. Despite the cost-savings constructors and prospective homeowners earn from manufactured homes, outdated stigma prevents them from being located anywhere other than agricultural zones. As part of her Affordability Agenda, Governor Spanberger has signed legislation which will expand where manufactured homes can be located. Under HB 655 and SB 346, starting July 1st Manufactured homes can now be located within any residential zone intended for traditional homes (with exceptions for historic districts). Further, localities will not be permitted to place different rules or any additional restrictions on manufactured homes that would not be imposed on single-family homes. Both bills passed the General Assembly with near-unanimous support. Executive Director of the Virginia Manufactured and Modular Housing Association Randy Grumbine says the new laws “could be very significant” in removing barriers that have been in place for decades. In 2020, a single-section manufactured home cost 35% the price of a similar-sized traditional home. Virginians have been facing affordability challenges when looking for housing – especially over the last several years – and they continue to experience a housing shortage which only exacerbates the problem. Del. Maldonado and Sen. VanValkenburg have noted that the strong bipartisan support they received for their respective bills is because Virginia’s housing crisis affects everyone regardless of partisan affiliation. Beyond the expansion of locations for manufactured homes, Governor Spanberger also signed HB 1227, which increases the amount of state funding toward affordable housing. She also signed HB 4, which gives localities the authority to require property owners to give the local government or developer the first chance to purchase property to build affordable housing. You can read the full article here for more details.
By VOW Ops April 23, 2026
[Virginia Mercury] Virginia Lawmakers Recess Special Session Without Budget Deal
By VOW Ops March 19, 2026
Virginia’s growing data center economy was the center of attention for this year’s General Assembly session, with lawmakers balancing the industry’s benefits against its costs to communities. Of the many bills that were proposed to regulate data centers, some passed both the House and Senate and now head to Governor Spanberger’s desk for either her signature or veto. SB 253 (Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth) would extend a program Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power Company offer low-income customers to reduce their monthly energy bills by weatherproofing their houses. The bill also gives the State Corporation Commission (SCC) the liberty to determine if more of the cost of generating electricity for data centers should fall onto them and large manufacturers instead of homeowners. SB 553 (Sen. Srinivasan, D-Loudoun) would direct water utilities to provide monthly or quarterly reports on how much water they are providing to data centers. Currently, data centers can withhold their water usage as an industry secret. SB 94 (Sen. Roem, D-Manassas) and HB 153 (Del. Thomas, D-Prince William) would require applicants who request localities to rezone for “high-load users” to submit site assessment reports. Localities would then be able to use the information from said reports to determine if the application conforms with their zoning requirements. HB 507 (Del. McAuliff, D-Loudoun) would mandate the Department of Environmental Quality to deny air permits for data center generators after July 2026 unless they meet stricter environmental regulations. Currently, data centers are allowed limited use of backup generators that run on diesel fuel, which have resulted in next-door neighbors complaining of noxious fumes spilling into their communities. HB 323 (Del. Sullivan, D-Fairfax) directs the Department of Energy to study how to best utilize waste heat generated by data centers to meet heating demands from neighboring buildings. One of the most robust debates involving data centers revolved around the sales tax exemption given to them on their server equipment and software. The Senate budget bill would end the exemption, hoping to recover the $1.6 billion they argue the state loses annually as a result. The House budget bill would keep the exemption but stipulate additional requirements for data centers to remain in compliance with receiving the exemption. The data center industry has rebutted the proposals to end the tax exemption, arguing that it has brought billions of dollars in investment into Virginia. Furthermore, the issue does not fall along clear, partisan lines, with both Democrats and Republicans arguing for against ending the exemption. The issue has ultimately ground Virginia’s budget approval process to a halt, with neither chamber coming to a consensus on the state’s biennial budget. Governor Spanberger has called for a special session beginning April 23rd so that the General Assembly can resolve the dispute. You can read the full article here for more details.
Show More